Kubernetes Is Not the Answer to Every Problem
I say this as someone who spends a significant part of their work building and operating Kubernetes clusters. Kubernetes is a fantastic tool — but it’s not for everything, and introducing it at the wrong time can cause more problems than it solves.
When to Use Kubernetes
- Many microservices (10+) that scale independently
- Variable load — autoscaling handles capacity automatically
- Multiple teams and environments — namespaces and RBAC provide clean separation
- High availability requirements (99.9%+ uptime) — self-healing, health checks, rolling updates
- Multi-cloud or hybrid strategy — Kubernetes abstracts the provider
When NOT to Use Kubernetes
- One or two simple applications — use a VPS, Docker Compose, or managed PaaS instead
- Small team with no K8s experience — the learning curve takes months
- No CI/CD pipeline yet — build that first; Kubernetes builds on top of it
- Cost-sensitive project — minimum production EKS cluster costs $250-800/month
- Legacy stateful apps not designed for containers — significant refactoring needed
Decision Framework
Ask yourself: Do you have 5+ independently deployable services? Variable load needing autoscaling? K8s expertise on the team? Budget for minimum K8s costs? Containerizable services?
Mostly yes → Kubernetes is likely a good fit. Mostly no → explore simpler alternatives first.
Kubernetes is an excellent tool — for the right problem. If you’re unsure whether Kubernetes is the right step — let’s talk. I’ll help assess your situation and find the best solution, which isn’t necessarily Kubernetes.